Gantt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Gantt v. State

572 So. 2d 569, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 210, 1991 WL 2787

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 16, 1991

DocketNo. 90-0679

StatusPublished

This text of 572 So. 2d 569 (Gantt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gantt v. State, 572 So. 2d 569, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 210, 1991 WL 2787 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find no error by the trial court in concluding that the appellant failed to testify “truthfully” at the trial of a codefendant thus violating a provision of [570]*570appellant’s agreement with the state. In addition to considering the record herein, which we consider sufficient to support af-firmance, we have also considered the record in the codefendant’s case pursuant to appellant’s request at oral argument that we do so.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. We find no error by the trial court in concluding that the appellant failed to testify “truthfully” at the trial of a codefendant thus violating a provision of [570]*570appellant’s agreement with the state. In addition to considering the record herein, which we consider sufficient to support af-firmance, we have also considered the record in the codefendant’s case pursuant to appellant’s request at oral argument that we do so.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and POLEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 So. 2d 569, 1991 Fla. App. LEXIS 210, 1991 WL 2787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gantt-v-state-fladistctapp-1991.