Gantt v. Morgan
This text of 555 F. App'x 275 (Gantt v. Morgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Iris Sapp Gantt, a pro se civil litigant, appeals the district court’s order dismissing Gantt’s civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Durden v. United States, 736 F.3d 296, 300 (4th Cir.2013) (stating that dismissals for lack of subject matter jurisdiction are reviewed de novo). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gantt v. Morgan, No. 1:12-cv-01123-TDS-JLW (M.D.N.C. Sept. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
555 F. App'x 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gantt-v-morgan-ca4-2014.