Gantt v. Gantt

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Gantt v. Gantt

56 S.E. 676, 76 S.C. 163, 1907 S.C. LEXIS 25

DecidedFebruary 27, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 56 S.E. 676 (Gantt v. Gantt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gantt v. Gantt, 56 S.E. 676, 76 S.C. 163, 1907 S.C. LEXIS 25 (S.C. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The decree of the Circuit Court in this case is so manifestly in accord with the overwhelming weight of the testimony and so full and satisfactory that it is adopted as the judgment of this Court. Since the matter is referred to in the exceptions it Is proper to say the statement in the decree, that the mortgage “was given for the use and benefit of E. C. Johnson ” was manifestly a clerical error, the intention being to say it was for the benefit of W. A. Johnson.

It is the judgment of this Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Woods.

The decree of the Circuit Court in this case is so manifestly in accord with the overwhelming weight of the testimony and so full and satisfactory that it is adopted as the judgment of this Court. Since the matter is referred to in the exceptions it Is proper to say the statement in the decree, that the mortgage “was given for the use and benefit of E. C. Johnson ” was manifestly a clerical error, the intention being to say it was for the benefit of W. A. Johnson.

It is the judgment of this Court, that the judgment of the Circuit Court be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

56 S.E. 676, 76 S.C. 163, 1907 S.C. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gantt-v-gantt-sc-1907.