Gants v. Vinard

1 Smith & H. 287
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 15, 1849·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The instruction given was erroneous. That requested by the plaintiff, was in accordance with the law applicable to the question put in issue by the plea of justification, and the evidence in the case. Lanter v. McEwen, 8 Blackf. 495.”

Judgment affirmed, &c„

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gants v. Vinard, 1 Smith & H. 287 (Ind. 1849).

1 Smith & H. 287 (Gants v. Vinard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newbit v. Statuck
35 Me. 315 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1853)