Gantka v. West
This text of Gantka v. West (Gantka v. West) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS VERSION INCLUDES THE ERRATA DATED 3MAY00- e
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS
NO . 99-622
RODNEY C. GANTKA , APPELLANT ,
V.
TOGO D. WEST , JR., SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE.
Before NEBEKER, Chief Judge, and KRAMER, FARLEY, HOLDAWAY, IVERS, STEINBERG, and GREENE, Judges.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the appellant's motion to exceed the page limit for his initial brief, and of the Secretary's opposition thereto, and it appearing that the appellant, in a lodged brief, has failed, without explanation, to comply with Rule 32(b) (the limit of 11 characters per inch), it is
ORDERED that the motion to file is denied and the Clerk is directed to return the lodged brief. It is further
ORDERED that the appellant's brief shall be filed within 15 days after the date of this order. Failure to file the brief in a timely fashion may subject the appeal to dismissal. See U.S. VET .APP . R. 31(b).
DATED: April 20, 2000 PER CURIAM.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gantka v. West, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gantka-v-west-cavc-2000.