Gant v. State

109 So. 446, 92 Fla. 373
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 27, 1926·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the offense of Breaking and Entering with intent to commit a Felony.

The record of the evidence has been examined and is found to be entirely insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. Neither does the record disclose the arraignment or plea of the defendant below.

The judgment is reversed.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell- and Buford, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur in the opinion. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gant v. State, 109 So. 446, 92 Fla. 373 (Fla. 1926).

109 So. 446 (Gant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.