Gant v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Gant v. State

109 So. 446, 92 Fla. 373

DecidedJuly 27, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 109 So. 446 (Gant v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gant v. State, 109 So. 446, 92 Fla. 373 (Fla. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the offense of Breaking and Entering with intent to commit a Felony.

The record of the evidence has been examined and is found to be entirely insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. Neither does the record disclose the arraignment or plea of the defendant below.

The judgment is reversed.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell- and Buford, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur in the opinion. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff in error was convicted of the offense of Breaking and Entering with intent to commit a Felony.

The record of the evidence has been examined and is found to be entirely insufficient to sustain the verdict and judgment. Neither does the record disclose the arraignment or plea of the defendant below.

The judgment is reversed.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell- and Buford, J. J., concur. Brown, C. J., and Ellis and Strum, J. J., concur in the opinion. •

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 So. 446, 92 Fla. 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gant-v-state-fla-1926.