Gant v. Flint-Goodridge Hospital of Dillard University
362 So. 2d 1117, 1978 La. LEXIS 6658
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gant v. Flint-Goodridge Hospital of Dillard University. Read the opinion of the Court — 1978 La. LEXIS 6194 →
Opinion
In re: Cynthia Thomas Gant applying for writ of certiorari. Parish of Orleans. 359 So.2d 279.
Motion for Reconsideration denied. The rebuttable presumption of timeliness is rebutted by the postmark. Timeliness could be shown only by either a United States post mark or receipt or certificate from the post office made at the time of the mailing, where the presumption does not apply, Rule 4, Section 4(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gant v. Flint-Goodridge Hospital of Dillard University, 362 So. 2d 1117, 1978 La. LEXIS 6658 (La. 1978).
362 So. 2d 1117 (Gant v. Flint-Goodridge Hospital of Dillard University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gant v. Flint-Goodridge Hospital of Dillard University
359 So. 2d 279 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)