Gano v. White

3 Ohio 20
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1827·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

The plea must be overruled. It has never been held that a bill in equity to enjoin a judgment at law is of itself a*releaseof errors.. The execution of such a release is often, in some courts perhaps-always, made a condition of allowing an injunction. When that is done, the party proceeding upon his bill would be held to have executed the release, and precluded from reversing the judgment for error, although no release were, in fact, executed. But here-there was no such order, and neither our statute, nor any rule of court makes it necessary, that a release of errors should precede-the operation of an injunction. There is consequently no legal foundation to sustain the plea.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gano v. White, 3 Ohio 20 (Ohio 1827).

3 Ohio 20 (Gano v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co.
2 A.2d 361 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1938)