Gannon v. Wilson

5 A. 381, 1 Sadler 422, 18 Week. No. 7, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 772
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 8, 1886·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

We see no error in the rejection of the evidence, nor in the charge of the court. If the defendant in error did violate an ordinance of the city, that violation was not a proximate cause of the injury. It is the duty of the owner of a horse not to voluntarily permit it to run on the sidewalk of a public street. When so found, he must rebut the presumption of negligence arising therefrom.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gannon v. Wilson, 5 A. 381, 1 Sadler 422, 18 Week. No. 7, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 772 (Pa. 1886).

5 A. 381 (Gannon v. Wilson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McClung v. Pennsylvania Taximeter Cab Co.
97 A. 694 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1916)
Breidenbach v. McCormick Co.
128 P. 423 (California Court of Appeal, 1912)
Holliday v. Gardner
59 N.E. 686 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1901)