Gannon v. Wilson
This text of 5 A. 381 (Gannon v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We see no error in the rejection of the evidence, nor in the charge of the court. If the defendant in error did violate an ordinance of the city, that violation was not a proximate cause of the injury. It is the duty of the owner of a horse not to voluntarily permit it to run on the sidewalk of a public street. When so found, he must rebut the presumption of negligence arising therefrom.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A. 381, 1 Sadler 422, 18 Week. No. 7, 1886 Pa. LEXIS 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gannon-v-wilson-pa-1886.