Gannon v. Turner

225 So. 2d 345, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5412
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 3, 1969·No. No. 68-454·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed upon authority of Railway Express Agency v. Brabham, Fla.1952, 62 So.2d 713; Smith v. City Products Corp., Fla.App.1962, 147 So.2d 590; Sharon v. Luten, Fla.App.1964, 165 So.2d 806; Pope [346] v. Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Co., Fla.App. 1960, 120 So.2d 227; and Lindsay v. Thomas, 1937, 128 Fla. 293, 174 So. 418.

HOBSON, C. J., and PIERCE and MANN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gannon v. Turner, 225 So. 2d 345, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5412 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

225 So. 2d 345 (Gannon v. Turner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. City Products Corporation
147 So. 2d 590 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1962)
Railway Express Agency v. Brabham
62 So. 2d 713 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
Pope v. Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Co.
120 So. 2d 227 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Sharon v. Luten
165 So. 2d 806 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Lindsay v. Thomas
174 So. 418 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)