Gannon v. Doyle
19 A. 331, 16 R.I. 726
Opinions
The court is of the opinion that the appellant is entitled to have the ground on which the appointment of a guardian is asked set forth in the application *Page 727 therefor, so that she may know the nature of the case which she will have to meet, and that, therefore, the application must be amended so as to set forth the same, or else be dismissed.
This decision rests on the assumption that the appellant had the right to take the appeal, but see Hamilton v. Court ofProbate of North Providence,
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gannon v. Doyle, 19 A. 331, 16 R.I. 726 (R.I. 1890).
19 A. 331 (Gannon v. Doyle) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gardiner v. Kennelly
89 A.2d 184 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1952)
State ex rel. Cook v. Circuit Court
138 N.E. 762 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1923)
Battey v. Mathewson
51 A. 102 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1902)