Gann v. Alabama Department of Corrections

531 U.S. 1185, 121 S. Ct. 1174, 148 L. Ed. 2d 1031
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 20, 2001
DocketNo. 99-8356; No. 99-8525; No. 99-9778; No. 99-9868; No. 99-10014; No. 99-10179; No. 00-630; No. 00-678; No. 00-697; No. 00-731; No. 00-5059; No. 00-5060; No. 00-5160; No. 00-5336; No. 00-5461; No. 00-5508; No. 00-5668; No. 00-5781; No. 00-5838; No. 00-5844; No. 00-5880; No. 00-5907; No. 00-5982; No. 00-6046; No. 00-6080; No. 00-6084; No. 00-6193; No. 00-6243; No. 00-6349; No. 00-6359; No. 00-6389; No. 00-6418; No. 00-6458; No. 00-6476; No. 00-6477; No. 00-6484; No. 00-6494; No. 00-6527; No. 00-6541; No. 00-6657; No. 00-6690; No. 00-6753; No. 00-6837; No. 00-6852; No. 00-6948; No. 00-6997; No. 00-7030; No. 00-7123
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 531 U.S. 1185 (Gann v. Alabama Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gann v. Alabama Department of Corrections, 531 U.S. 1185, 121 S. Ct. 1174, 148 L. Ed. 2d 1031 (2001).

Opinion

[1185]*1185529 U. S. 1090;

529 U. S. 1076;

ante, p. 844;

ante, p. 848;

ante, p. 856;

ante, p. 865;

ante, p. 1073;

ante, p. 1074;

ante, p. 1075;

ante, p. 1052;

ante, p. 884;

ante, p. 810;

ante, p. 994;

ante, p. 898;

ante, p. 905;

ante, p. 907;

ante, p. 912;

ante, p. 961;

[1186]*1186No. 00-5838. No. 00-5844. No. 00-5880. No. 00-5907. No. 00-5982. No. 00-6046. No. 00-6080. No. 00-6084. No. 00-6193. No. 00-6243. No. 00-6349. No. 00-6359. No. 00-6389. No. 00-6418. No. 00-6458. No. 00-6476. No. 00-6477. No. 00-6484. No. 00-6494. No. 00-6527. No. 00-6541. No. 00-6657. No. 00-6690. No. 00-6753. No. 00-6837. No. 00-6852.

ante, p. 963;

ante, p. 1016;

ante, p. 964;

ante, p. 965;

ante, p. 981;

ante, p. 995;

ante, p. 1017;

ante, p. 1038;

ante, p. 998;

ante, p. 1053;

ante, p. 1039;

ante, p. 1054;.

ante, p. 999;

ante, p. 1082;

ante, p. 1055;

ante, p. 1022;

ante, p. 1024;

ante, p. 1085;

ante, p. 1056;

ante, p. 1042;

ante, p. 1089;

[1187]*1187No. 00-6948. No. 00-6997. No. 00-7030. No. 00-7123.

ante, p. 1092;

ante, p. 1057;

ante, p. 1094; and

ante, p. 1097. Petitions for rehearing denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harrison v. Norton
429 F. Supp. 2d 83 (District of Columbia, 2006)
Dickerson v. Mitchell
336 F. Supp. 2d 770 (N.D. Ohio, 2004)
Davie v. Mitchell
324 F. Supp. 2d 862 (N.D. Ohio, 2004)
State v. Byrd
762 N.E.2d 1043 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2001)
Luellen v. Henderson
54 F. Supp. 2d 775 (W.D. Tennessee, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 U.S. 1185, 121 S. Ct. 1174, 148 L. Ed. 2d 1031, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gann-v-alabama-department-of-corrections-scotus-2001.