Ganin v. Ganin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ganin v. Ganin

92 A.D.2d 489, 459 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16697

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 10, 1983·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Murphy, J.), entered June 21,1982, which, [490]*490inter alla, awarded plaintiff a judgment of separation by reason of abandonment, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, without costs or disbursements, to increase the support award to $1,200 per week and, except as thus modified, affirmed. We find that the award of $800 per week in support is not in keeping with the parties’ preseparation standard of living and fails to take into account the wife’s needs. Given the 35-year duration of the marriage, the relatively lavish standard of living which the parties enjoyed, the wife’s age and the improbability that she can find gainful employment, her lack of personal assets other than an interest in the marital home, and the husband’s ample income and substantial assets, we believe that an award of $1,200 per week would be appropriate and modify accordingly. We have examined plaintiff’s other contentions and find that they are without merit. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Lynch and Kassal, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Murphy, J.), entered June 21,1982, which, [490]*490inter alla, awarded plaintiff a judgment of separation by reason of abandonment, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, without costs or disbursements, to increase the support award to $1,200 per week and, except as thus modified, affirmed. We find that the award of $800 per week in support is not in keeping with the parties’ preseparation standard of living and fails to take into account the wife’s needs. Given the 35-year duration of the marriage, the relatively lavish standard of living which the parties enjoyed, the wife’s age and the improbability that she can find gainful employment, her lack of personal assets other than an interest in the marital home, and the husband’s ample income and substantial assets, we believe that an award of $1,200 per week would be appropriate and modify accordingly. We have examined plaintiff’s other contentions and find that they are without merit. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sandler, Sullivan, Lynch and Kassal, JJ.

Ganin v. Ganin, 92 A.D.2d 489, 459 N.Y.S.2d 85, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

92 A.D.2d 489 (Ganin v. Ganin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related