Ganim v. Ganim

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ganim v. Ganim

172 A.D. 924, 157 N.Y.S. 1126

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.D. 924 (Ganim v. Ganim) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ganim v. Ganim, 172 A.D. 924, 157 N.Y.S. 1126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Order modified on reargument by reducing the judgment so as to make the damages therein $132, and interest thereon- from February 10, 1915, when demand was made on [defendant, to June 17, 1915, when verdict was rendered, instead of $500, upon the ground that the trial justice, upon the default, should have directed the verdict only for the sum of $132 and such interest, instead of $500, the full amount of the undertaking. Said order as so modified is affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to the right of defendant, on proof that the process by which this action was commenced was served on defendant within the city of Hew York, to apply to this court at Special Term to further amend said judgment by striking therefrom the costs and disbursements allowed therein to the plaintiff. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order modified on reargument by reducing the judgment so as to make the damages therein $132, and interest thereon- from February 10, 1915, when demand was made on [defendant, to June 17, 1915, when verdict was rendered, instead of $500, upon the ground that the trial justice, upon the default, should have directed the verdict only for the sum of $132 and such interest, instead of $500, the full amount of the undertaking. Said order as so modified is affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to the right of defendant, on proof that the process by which this action was commenced was served on defendant within the city of Hew York, to apply to this court at Special Term to further amend said judgment by striking therefrom the costs and disbursements allowed therein to the plaintiff. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Mills and Rich, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 A.D. 924, 157 N.Y.S. 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ganim-v-ganim-nyappdiv-1916.