Gani v. Zarger

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gani v. Zarger

22 A.D.3d 799, 802 N.Y.S.2d 626

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 31, 2005·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Solomon Algazi appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated December 21, 2004, which conditionally granted the plaintiffs motion to restore the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in conditionally granting the plaintiffs motion to restore the action (see LeBlanc v Budman, [800] 18 AD3d 718 [2005]; Giannoccoli v One Cent. Park W. Assoc., 15 AD3d 348 [2005]; Betty v City of New York, 12 AD3d 472 [2004]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Solomon Algazi appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated December 21, 2004, which conditionally granted the plaintiffs motion to restore the action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in conditionally granting the plaintiffs motion to restore the action (see LeBlanc v Budman, [800] 18 AD3d 718 [2005]; Giannoccoli v One Cent. Park W. Assoc., 15 AD3d 348 [2005]; Betty v City of New York, 12 AD3d 472 [2004]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.

Gani v. Zarger, 22 A.D.3d 799, 802 N.Y.S.2d 626 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

22 A.D.3d 799 (Gani v. Zarger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related