Gani v. Zarger
This text of 22 A.D.3d 799 (Gani v. Zarger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Solomon Algazi appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated December 21, 2004, which conditionally granted the plaintiffs motion to restore the action.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in conditionally granting the plaintiffs motion to restore the action (see LeBlanc v Budman, [800]*80018 AD3d 718 [2005]; Giannoccoli v One Cent. Park W. Assoc., 15 AD3d 348 [2005]; Betty v City of New York, 12 AD3d 472 [2004]). Adams, J.P., Ritter, Goldstein, Skelos and Dillon, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 A.D.3d 799, 802 N.Y.S.2d 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gani-v-zarger-nyappdiv-2005.