Gangloff v. Gangloff

274 A.D. 1067, 86 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1949 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6092
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gangloff v. Gangloff. Read the opinion of the Court — 274 A.D. 1068

Opinion

In this action by the husband for annulment on the ground of fraud, the wife’s motion for a counsel fee was denied. Order reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, the motion granted, without costs, and plaintiff [1068]*1068directed to.pay defendant a counsel fee of $300, one half payable within ten days after entry of the order hereon, and the balance before trial. In our opinion, the denial of the motion was an improvident exercise of discretion. Johnston, Acting P. J., Adel, Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gangloff v. Gangloff, 274 A.D. 1067, 86 N.Y.S.2d 457, 1949 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1949).

274 A.D. 1067 (Gangloff v. Gangloff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.