Gangl v. Dean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Gangl v. Dean

72 A.D.2d 834, 421 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14122

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 2, 1979

StatusPublished

This text of 72 A.D.2d 834 (Gangl v. Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gangl v. Dean, 72 A.D.2d 834, 421 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14122 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding, pursuant to CPLR article 78, to compel the respondent Tompkins County Surrogate to determine certain applications relative to the estate of Paul W. Morgan, deceased, which applications have been pending since May, 1977. Although the voluminous papers submitted contain a myriad of charges and counter-charges regarding the conduct of the parties in the underlying estate matter, it appears undisputed that respondent has failed to finally determine, inter alia, an application for discovery made by the attorney for Helen—Ruth Miller and a cross motion by petitioner to (1) determine his compensation pursuant to SCPA 2110 and (2) be relieved of further responsibilities in the estate. These matters remain unresolved although the applications were apparently argued before respondent on May 20, 1977 and were finally submitted in July, 1977. The papers further indicate, without explanation, that although decedent died in February, 1969, his will was not admitted to probate until March, 1976. Under the circumstances, we are of the opinion that respondent should be compelled to act on the matters pending before him (cf. Matter of Briggs v Lauman, 21 AD2d 734, mot for lv to app den 15 NY2d 481). Petition granted, without costs, and respondent is directed to render a final decision on the applications referred to herein within 30 days of the date of service upon him of a copy of the judgment to be entered on this determination. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding, pursuant to CPLR article 78, to compel the respondent Tompkins County Surrogate to determine certain applications relative to the estate of Paul W. Morgan, deceased, which applications have been pending since May, 1977. Although the voluminous papers submitted contain a myriad of charges and counter-charges regarding the conduct of the parties in the underlying estate matter, it appears undisputed that respondent has failed to finally determine, inter alia, an application for discovery made by the attorney for Helen—Ruth Miller and a cross motion by petitioner to (1) determine his compensation pursuant to SCPA 2110 and (2) be relieved of further responsibilities in the estate. These matters remain unresolved although the applications were apparently argued before respondent on May 20, 1977 and were finally submitted in July, 1977. The papers further indicate, without explanation, that although decedent died in February, 1969, his will was not admitted to probate until March, 1976. Under the circumstances, we are of the opinion that respondent should be compelled to act on the matters pending before him (cf. Matter of Briggs v Lauman, 21 AD2d 734, mot for lv to app den 15 NY2d 481). Petition granted, without costs, and respondent is directed to render a final decision on the applications referred to herein within 30 days of the date of service upon him of a copy of the judgment to be entered on this determination. Sweeney, J. P., Kane, Main, Mikoll and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

72 A.D.2d 834, 421 N.Y.S.2d 834, 1979 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14122, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gangl-v-dean-nyappdiv-1979.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack