Ganezer v. Directby
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PHIL GANEZER and LYNETTE SOHL, No. 09-55818 on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; et D.C. No. al., 2:08-cv-08666-
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
GAF-RC
Central District of
v.
California,
DIRECTBUY, INC., an Indiana Los Angeles Corporation, ORDER
Defendant-Appellant.
Filed June 25, 2009
Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw, Johnnie B. Rawlinson, and N. Randy Smith, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
The judgment of the district court is vacated. This matter is remanded to the district court with instructions to stay proceedings pending a decision by the United States Supreme Court in Hertz Corp. v. Friend, No. 08-16963, 2008 WL 4750198 (9th Cir. Oct. 30, 2008), cert. granted, 2009 WL 559348 (U.S. June 8, 2009) (No. 08-1107). The appeal is removed from the July 10, 2009, Pasadena calendar.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2009 Thomson Reuters/West.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ganezer v. Directby (Ganezer v. Directby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.