Ganesa McIntosh, on behalf of her minor child, M.M. v. Minda Paxton (Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court: CV-18-900886).

Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided July 12, 2024·No. SC-2023-0679·Published

Opinion

Rel: July 12, 2024

STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE SUPREME COURT SPECIAL TERM, 2024

SC-2023-0679

Ganesa McIntosh, on behalf of her minor child, M.M. v. Minda Paxton (Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court: CV-18-900886).

PARKER, Chief Justice.

AFFIRMED. NO OPINION.

See Rule 53(a)(1) and (a)(2)(F), Ala. R. App. P.

Shaw, Bryan, Mendheim, and Mitchell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ganesa McIntosh, on behalf of her minor child, M.M. v. Minda Paxton (Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court: CV-18-900886)., (Ala. 2024).

Ganesa McIntosh, on behalf of her minor child, M.M. v. Minda Paxton (Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court: CV-18-900886). (Ganesa McIntosh, on behalf of her minor child, M.M. v. Minda Paxton (Appeal from Tuscaloosa Circuit Court: CV-18-900886).) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.