Gandza v. Gandza

Connecticut Superior Court

Gandza v. Gandza

10 Conn. Super. Ct. 85

CourtConnecticut Superior Court

DecidedNovember 4, 1941

DocketFile No. 61407

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Conn. Super. Ct. 85 (Gandza v. Gandza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gandza v. Gandza, 10 Conn. Super. Ct. 85 (Colo. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

The plea is upon the ground there was another action for divorce pending in another state between the same parties and for the same cause. The demurrer is upon the ground that this is not a bar.

So far as the plea in abatement is concerned it is not a bar. It is well settled in this State that jurisdictional questions may be raised as to foreign divorce proceedings (Millsvs. Mills, 119 Conn. 612), and to give judgment on the plea would be to deny this right. And see, Farley-Harvey Co. vs.Madden, 105 Conn. 679, 682.

The demurrer is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The plea is upon the ground there was another action for divorce pending in another state between the same parties and for the same cause. The demurrer is upon the ground that this is not a bar.

So far as the plea in abatement is concerned it is not a bar. It is well settled in this State that jurisdictional questions may be raised as to foreign divorce proceedings (Millsvs. Mills, 119 Conn. 612), and to give judgment on the plea would be to deny this right. And see, Farley-Harvey Co. vs.Madden, 105 Conn. 679, 682.

The demurrer is sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Conn. Super. Ct. 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gandza-v-gandza-connsuperct-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack