Gandy v. Pinkerton
34 Pa. Super. 87, 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 84
Opinions
Opinion by
In an opinion filed tiiis day in Gandy v. Weckerly, ante, p. 79, the question involved in this case is disposed of, and inasmuch as the affidavit in that case is more adequate in its statement of the defense, it is not necessary to repeat what is therein said.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gandy v. Pinkerton, 34 Pa. Super. 87, 1907 Pa. Super. LEXIS 84 (Pa. 1907).
34 Pa. Super. 87 (Gandy v. Pinkerton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McSorley v. Allen
36 Pa. Super. 271 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1908)