Gandy, J. v. Montg. Cty Prothy and S. Reeder
This text of Gandy, J. v. Montg. Cty Prothy and S. Reeder (Gandy, J. v. Montg. Cty Prothy and S. Reeder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
JAMIL GANDY, : No. 42 MM 2018 : Petitioner : : : v. : : : PROTHONOTARY CCP MONT. CO. CV. : AND SASHA REEDER, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 27th day of April, 2018, the Application for Leave to File Original
Process is GRANTED, and the “Writ of Habeas Corpus” is DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gandy, J. v. Montg. Cty Prothy and S. Reeder, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gandy-j-v-montg-cty-prothy-and-s-reeder-pa-2018.