Gandolfi v. United States

152 F. 656, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5057
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJanuary 18, 1907
DocketNo. 4,379
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 152 F. 656 (Gandolfi v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gandolfi v. United States, 152 F. 656, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5057 (circtsdny 1907).

Opinion

HAZEL, District Judge.

The merchandise in question, consisting of anchovies contained in tin boxer, or.cans, is dutiable under paragraph 258 of the Tariff Act of July 24, 1897, r. 11, § 1, Schedule G, 30 Stat. 171 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1050]. Duty was assessed by the collector at ten cents per box, as “contain-, g more than 33 and not more than 70 cubic inches.” The protestante assert that the merchandise is dutiable at only five cents per box, ns containing more than 21 'and not more than 33 cubic inches.

' Upon the" authority of In re Johnson et al. (C. C.) 56 Fed. 822, and Kauffmann Bros. v. United States (C. C.) 99 Fed. 430, holding that it was not so much the intention of Congress to impose a duty on fish as upon the tin cans in which the same are contained, and the opinion of the Board clearly stating the impracticability of opening the tin boxes or cans in which the fish are imported in order to ascertain the precise quantity therein contained, the contention of the importers is overruled, and the decision of the board affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Palma
4 Ct. Cust. 140 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
152 F. 656, 1907 U.S. App. LEXIS 5057, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gandolfi-v-united-states-circtsdny-1907.