Gandía v. Plazuela Sugar Co.

33 P.R. Dec. 1053
CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico
DecidedJune 27, 1924
DocketNo. 3317
StatusPublished

This text of 33 P.R. Dec. 1053 (Gandía v. Plazuela Sugar Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gandía v. Plazuela Sugar Co., 33 P.R. Dec. 1053 (prsupreme 1924).

Opinion

Visto el tomo 14 R.C.L. pág. 326, sección 28; 21 Id. pág. 440, sección 5; los casos de Continental Jewelry Co. v. Pugh Bros., 53 So. 324; Almada v. Vandecar, 185 Pac. 907, Chiles et al. v. H. Smith Commission Co., 216, S.W. 11, y la constante jurisprudencia de este tribunal en el sentido de que se presume que la sentencia apelada es correcta in-cumbiendo al apelante establecer los errores, se confirma la misma.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Almada v. Vandecar
185 P. 907 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1919)
Continental Jewelry Co. v. Pugh Bros.
53 So. 324 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
33 P.R. Dec. 1053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gandia-v-plazuela-sugar-co-prsupreme-1924.