Ganceres v. Ganceres

703 So. 2d 1220, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10, 1998 WL 2498
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 2, 1998·No. No. 97-1227·Published

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order adjudicating appellant in contempt and sentencing her for non-payment of child support. She asserts that the evidence shows she has no money to pay the support, even though she says she has paid a total of $1,500 on two occasions to purge herself of her contempt.

We cannot know the facts upon which the trial judge based his decision because appellant has not brought us a transcript of the testimony, if such exists. We have no option but to affirm. See Peck v. Delta Fire Sprinkler, Inc., 675 So.2d 711 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Haddad v. Cura, 674 So.2d 168 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Sullivan v. Sullivan, 668 So.2d 329 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). See also Bartolotta v. Bartolotta, 687 So.2d 1385 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997).

AFFIRMED.

HARRIS and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ganceres v. Ganceres, 703 So. 2d 1220, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 10, 1998 WL 2498 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

703 So. 2d 1220 (Ganceres v. Ganceres) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haddad v. Cura
674 So. 2d 168 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Sullivan v. Sullivan
668 So. 2d 329 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Bartolotta v. Bartolotta
687 So. 2d 1385 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Peck v. Delta Fire Sprinkler, Inc.
675 So. 2d 711 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)