Gancarz v. Capito

Opinion

1 HONORABLE RICHARD A. JONES

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE

10 PAUL GANCARZ, an individual; CASE NO. 3:23-cv-01113-RAJ DANIEL TURETCHI, an 11 individual;COLTON BROWN, an ORDER individual; JAMES JOHNSON and 12 AMELIA JOHNSON, individually and husband and wife., 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 DAVID ALAN CAPITO II, aka 16 VYACHESLAV ARKANGELSKIY, 17 an individual,

18 Defendant.

19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 THIS MATTER is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Alternative Service 21 and to Amend the Case Caption (“Plaintiffs’ Motion”). Dkt. # 9. The Court has reviewed 22 the motion, the materials filed in support of the motion, the balance of the record, and the 23 governing law. For the reasons stated below, The Court GRANTS in part and DENIES 24 in part Plaintiffs’ Motion. Dkt. # 9. 25 26 1 II. BACKGROUND 2 Plaintiffs filed this action on July 25, 2023. Dkt. # 1. Plaintiffs “are members of, 3 or have an affiliation with, an organization called Patriot Front.” Id. at ¶ 2. As Plaintiffs 4 characterize it, Patriot Front’s mission “is to ‘reforge . . . our people, born to this nation 5 of our European race . . . as a new collective capable of asserting our right to cultural 6 independence.’” Id. Plaintiffs claim Defendant “infiltrated Patriot Front using a false 7 identity and later gained unauthorized access to confidential information about the 8 Plaintiffs from Patriot Front’s computer databases[,]” which allegedly caused them 9 “serious harm, including loss of their jobs.” Id. at ¶ 4. 10 On November 27, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ request to extend time to 11 serve or seek leave for alternative service on Defendant Capito until February 21, 2024. 12 Dkt. # 8. Plaintiffs engaged the services of Stephen Robinson, a process server and 13 private investigator. See Dkt. # 9 at 3; Dkt. # 10. Mr. Robinson could not find Mr. Capito 14 to effectuate service despite using various social media resources, a database including 15 information from three major credit-reporting agencies, and vehicle registration records. 16 Dkt. # 10 ¶ 5-6. Defendant has purportedly changed his name several times. See Dkt. # 17 9 at 8; Dkt. # 1 ¶ 11; Dkt. #10 ¶ 4. 18 After unsuccessful attempts to serve Defendant, Plaintiffs now ask this Court to 19 permit service by publication. See Dkt. # 9. Plaintiffs request an additional seventy-five 20 days to complete the service by publication in order to retain the services of an 21 appropriate newspaper and publish the summons for a period of six weeks. See id. at 11. 22 23 24 25 26 1 III. DISCUSSION 2 A. Alternative Service 3 Alternative methods of service must comport with due process. Rio Props., Inc. v. 4 Rio Int’l Interlink, 284 F.3d 1007, 1016. Due process requires that a defendant in a civil 5 action be given notice of the action that is reasonably calculated to apprise the defendant 6 of the pendency of the action and afford the defendant an opportunity to present his or 7 her objection. Mullane v. Cent. Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 (1950). 8 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(e)(1) authorizes litigants in federal court to 9 effect service of a summons and complaint in any manner provided by the law of the state 10 in which the court sits. Fed. R. Civ. P 4(e)(1). Under Washington law, “[s]ubstitute 11 service by mail or constructive service by publication is permissible when the plaintiff 12 sets forth the following facts: (1) that the defendant could not be found in Washington 13 after a diligent search, (2) that the defendant was a resident of Washington, and (3) that 14 the defendant had either left the state or concealed himself within it, with intent to defraud 15 creditors or avoid service of process.” Pascua v. Heil, 108 P.3d 1253, 1257 (Wash. Ct. 16 App. 2005); see also RCW 4.28.100 (authorizing service by publication under certain 17 circumstances where the plaintiff, its agent, or its attorney submits an affidavit stating 18 that he or she believes that the defendant “has departed [the state] with intent . . . to avoid 19 the service of a summons, or keeps himself or herself concealed therein with like intent”); 20 RCW 4.28.110 (setting forth the requirements for service by publication). Statutes 21 authorizing service by means other than personal service, i.e., constructive and substitute 22 service, require strict compliance.” Pascua, 108 P.3d at 1257. If leave of the Court is 23 provided, the publication must be in a generally circulated newspaper in the county where 24 the action is brought, published once a week for six consecutive weeks. See RCW 25 4.28.110. 26 1 The Court concludes that Plaintiffs established the first two requirements. The 2 Court is satisfied that Plaintiffs’ process server and investigator conducted a diligent 3 search to find the Defendant, including physically visiting and checking four possible 4 addresses on multiple occasions. See Dkt. # 10 ¶ 7. Plaintiffs have tried to locate 5 Defendant at all of his known addresses, reach Defendant by telephone, and contact 6 Defendant through individuals currently residing at his listed home addresses. See id. 7 Plaintiffs have established that Defendant was a resident of Washington as Defendant 8 had a car formerly registered in Washington, used a Washington address for his driver’s 9 license, and had a lease in Washington that ended in 2017. See id. ¶¶ 5, 7. 10 The Court is not satisfied that Plaintiffs met the state law requirements to show 11 that Defendant is concealing himself with an intent to avoid service. Here, Plaintiffs do 12 not present a supporting affidavit of an attorney or agent stating the reasons he or she 13 believes that Mr. Capito is avoiding service. See GS Holistic, LLC v. Mitchell & Mitchell 14 Enterprises, Inc., No. 23-cv-5214, 2023 WL 5935605, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Sept. 12, 15 2023). Therefore, the Court denies Plaintiffs’ Motion. Dkt. # 9. Plaintiffs may file a 16 renewed motion for leave to serve Mr. Capito by publication that satisfies the 17 requirements of federal and Washington law within fourteen days (14) of this Order. 18 B. Amend Caption 19 Plaintiffs also request to amend the case caption to include the name “Ryan 20 Smith,” which they believe to be a new alias used by Defendant. Dkt. # 9 at 9-10. The 21 Court GRANTS this request. Accordingly, “aka Ryan Smith” shall be included in an 22 amended case caption. 23 24 25 26 1 IV. CONCLUSION 2 For the above reasons, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part 3 Plaintiffs’ Motion. Dkt. # 9. Accordingly, “aka Ryan Smith” shall be included in an 4 amended case caption and Plaintiffs may file a renewed motion for leave to serve Mr. 5 Capito by publication within fourteen days (14) of this Order. 6

7 Dated this 12th day of September, 2024 8

9 A 10 11 The Honorable Richard A. Jones 12 United States District Judge 13

17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26