Gammon v. Libby
88 A. 480, 110 Me. 552, 1913 Me. LEXIS 68
Opinion
A real action for the recovery of a strip of land in Hartford. The verdict was for the plaintiff and defendant files a motion' for a new trial. The evidence was conflicting and, while, it is possible that upon the evidence the court, if the issue had been submitted to it, might have come to a different conclusion, it is our opinion that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the action- of the jury and that the motion must be overruled. Motion overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gammon v. Libby, 88 A. 480, 110 Me. 552, 1913 Me. LEXIS 68 (Me. 1913).
88 A. 480 (Gammon v. Libby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boisvert v. Charest
193 A. 841 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1937)