Gammino v. Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P.
This text of 267 F. App'x 949 (Gammino v. Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a thorough opinion, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas held that the asserted claims of the two patents at issue in this litigation, U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,125 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,812,-650, are anticipated by prior art and therefore are invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b). We affirm for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion. No purpose would be served by simply retracing the analysis of the district court, which is fully sufficient to resolve this appeal. In light of our disposition of the invalidity claim, we need not address the district court’s ruling on the motion for summary judgment of non-infringement.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
267 F. App'x 949, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gammino-v-southwestern-bell-telephone-lp-cafc-2008.