Gammarino v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision

737 N.E.2d 56, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1453, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2702
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 25, 2000
Docket00-1500
StatusPublished

This text of 737 N.E.2d 56 (Gammarino v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gammarino v. Hamilton Cty. Bd. of Revision, 737 N.E.2d 56, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1453, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2702 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Board of Tax Appeals, No. 98-M-779. This cause, here on appeal and cross-appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals, was considered in the manner prescribed by law. Upon consideration of the joint motion to remand case to Board of Tax Appeals upon settlement,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to remand case be, and hereby is, granted, and this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals for entry of an order.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to bear their respective costs herein expended; and that a mandate be sent to the Board of Tax Appeals to carry this judgment into execution; and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Board of Tax Appeals for entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
737 N.E.2d 56, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1453, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gammarino-v-hamilton-cty-bd-of-revision-ohio-2000.