Gammage v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Gammage v. State

152 S.E. 600, 41 Ga. App. 285, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 536

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMarch 5, 1930

Docket20205

StatusPublished

This text of 152 S.E. 600 (Gammage v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gammage v. State, 152 S.E. 600, 41 Ga. App. 285, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 536 (Ga. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence; the jury, by their verdict, said that the evidence excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused; and the trial judge approved their verdict. This court can not say that the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was improperly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Jjuke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

The defendant was convicted on circumstantial evidence; the jury, by their verdict, said that the evidence excluded every reasonable hypothesis save that of the guilt of the accused; and the trial judge approved their verdict. This court can not say that the motion for a new trial, based on the general grounds only, was improperly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Jjuke, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 S.E. 600, 41 Ga. App. 285, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gammage-v-state-gactapp-1930.