Gamiel v. Curtis & Reiss-Curtis, P.C.

915 N.E.2d 1160, 13 N.Y.3d 763, 886 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 3484
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedSeptember 8, 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 915 N.E.2d 1160 (Gamiel v. Curtis & Reiss-Curtis, P.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gamiel v. Curtis & Reiss-Curtis, P.C., 915 N.E.2d 1160, 13 N.Y.3d 763, 886 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 3484 (N.Y. 2009).

Opinion

Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the March 10, 2009 Appellate Division order, dismissed as untimely (see CPLR 5513 [b]); motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the Supreme Court judgment entered on the Appellate Division order, dismissed upon the ground that the judgment is not the final paper from which leave to appeal may be sought (see CPLR 5611). Motion for a stay dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
915 N.E.2d 1160, 13 N.Y.3d 763, 886 N.Y.S.2d 863, 2009 N.Y. LEXIS 3484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gamiel-v-curtis-reiss-curtis-pc-ny-2009.