Gamez v. State

105 S.W.2d 232, 132 Tex. Crim. 389, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 255
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 5, 1937
DocketNo. 18955.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 105 S.W.2d 232 (Gamez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gamez v. State, 105 S.W.2d 232, 132 Tex. Crim. 389, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 255 (Tex. 1937).

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

— The offense is murder; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of ninety-nine years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

Attached to the motion for new trial are three affidavits relating to certain misconduct of two of the State’s witnesses. In the order overruling the motion for new trial the trial judge stated that he heard the evidence submitted in connection therewith. In the absence of the evidence thus presented, this court must indulge the presumption in favor of the correctness of the ruling of the trial judge.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schorr v. State
132 S.W.2d 898 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.W.2d 232, 132 Tex. Crim. 389, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gamez-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.