Gamer v. Seling
This text of 114 F. App'x 940 (Gamer v. Seling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Donald Gamer, who is civilly committed as a violent sexual predator at the Special Commitment Center in Washington state, appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment for defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, alleging that he was deprived of mental health care treatment. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo, Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1131 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc), and we affirm for the reasons stated by the Magistrate Judge in his re[941]*941port and recommendation adopted by the district court on April 28, 2003.
We have considered Gamer’s contentions and find them unpersuasive.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 F. App'x 940, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gamer-v-seling-ca9-2004.