Gamboa v. Derr

CourtDistrict Court, D. Hawaii
DecidedFebruary 8, 2023
Docket1:22-cv-00106
StatusUnknown

This text of Gamboa v. Derr (Gamboa v. Derr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Hawaii primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gamboa v. Derr, (D. Haw. 2023).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI‘I JESUS GAMBOA, Case No. 22-cv-00106 DKW-WRP

Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITION vs. UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2241 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ESTELLA DERR,

Respondent.

On March 21, 2022, Jesus Gamboa petitioned, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 2241, for the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to credit time that he served in jail from September 3, 2013 to November 3, 2014 and, then, recalculate his projected release date. Dkt. No. 1. In response, with supporting evidence, the government asserts that the BOP has now credited Gamboa for 439 days he served in jail from August 20, 2013 through November 1, 2014, and recalculated his release date. In light of the foregoing, the Court finds that this case is moot. Specifically, when a petitioner’s claimed injury cannot be redressed by a favorable decision of the court, a petition for habeas corpus is moot. Burnett v. Lampert, 432 F.3d 996, 1000-01 (9th Cir. 2005). Here, Gamboa’s claimed injury was the BOP failing to credit time he served in jail prior to his federal sentence commencing. The evidence reflects that Gamboa has now received all the time he requested. In fact, Gamboa has received more credit than he actually requested.1 In reply, Gamboa appears to contend otherwise, claiming that the BOP has not given him credit for

time between September 3, 2013 and November 3, 2014. See Dkt. No. 11 at 1. The evidence reflects, however, that this is simply not true with respect to time through November 1, 2014. Dkt. No. 10-14. As for November 2 and November 3,

2014, the evidence reflects that Gamboa received credit for these days from a state court. Dkt. No. 10-12. Therefore, as the government argues, Gamboa was not entitled to a double credit for those days on his federal sentence. See Dkt. No. 10 at 4 (citing 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b)).

Accordingly, based upon the record, the Court finds that Gamboa’s alleged injuries have been redressed and, thus, this case should be DISMISSED AS MOOT. Cf. Rahman v. Graber, 615 F. App’x 876 (9th Cir. Sep. 2, 2015)

(explaining that an appeal was moot after a federal prisoner sought credit towards //

//

1As mentioned, Gamboa sought credit for time served between September 3, 2013 and November 4, 2014−a total of 429 days. He has, instead, received credit for 439 days. his sentence, something that the Bureau of Prisons granted during the pendency of the appeal). The Clerk is instructed to CLOSE this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 8, 2023 at Honolulu, Hawat‘1.

Ko /s/ Derrick K. Watson dot Derrick K. Watson Ra Chief United States District Judge

Jesus Gamboa v. Estella Derr; Civil 22-00106 DK W-WRP; ORDER DISMISSING PETITION UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2241 FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gamboa v. Derr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gamboa-v-derr-hid-2023.