GAMBOA-TAPIA v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

GAMBOA-TAPIA v. State

308 S.W.3d 298, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 477, 2010 WL 1554427

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 20, 2010·No. ED 93358·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Armando Gamboa-Tapia, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Armando Gamboa-Tapia, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

GAMBOA-TAPIA v. State, 308 S.W.3d 298, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 477, 2010 WL 1554427 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

308 S.W.3d 298 (GAMBOA-TAPIA v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.