Gamble v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gamble v. State

393 S.W.3d 619, 2013 WL 978708, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 304

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 12, 2013·No. No. ED 98183·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Robert Gamble, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on two of his three claims. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant, Robert Gamble, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing on two of his three claims. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Gamble v. State, 393 S.W.3d 619, 2013 WL 978708, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 304 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

393 S.W.3d 619 (Gamble v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.