Gamble v. Norwood

821 N.E.2d 1026, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1405
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 2, 2005
Docket2004-1743
StatusPublished

This text of 821 N.E.2d 1026 (Gamble v. Norwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gamble v. Norwood, 821 N.E.2d 1026, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2005).

Opinion

Hamilton App. No. C-040019, 2004-Ohio-4661. Discretionary appeal accepted.

Pfeifer and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

On motion for admission pro hae vice of Scott Bullock, Robert W. Gall, William H. Mellor, and Dana Berliner by Robert P. Malloy. Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gamble v. City of Norwood, Unpublished Decision (9-3-2004)
2004 Ohio 4661 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
821 N.E.2d 1026, 105 Ohio St. 3d 1405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gamble-v-norwood-ohio-2005.