Gamble v. Mahoney
944 So. 2d 1229, 2006 WL 3740796
Opinion
David GAMBLE, Appellant,
v.
William MAHONEY, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
David Gamble, pro se, Appellant.
No appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of November *1230 8, 2006, the Court has determined that the Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Amend Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Rehearing is not an appealable order. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
BROWNING, C.J., DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gamble v. Mahoney, 944 So. 2d 1229, 2006 WL 3740796 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).
944 So. 2d 1229 (Gamble v. Mahoney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Thacker v. State
944 So. 2d 1229 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)