Gamble v. Kenworthy
This text of 604 F. App'x 301 (Gamble v. Kenworthy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Ricky Leander Gamble appeals the district court’s order granting Defendants’ summary judgment motion on his claims alleging Defendants violated his First Amendment rights, as well as his rights under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000cc to 2000cc-5 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Gamble v. Kenworthy, No. 5:12-ct-03053-F, 2015 WL 631329 (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
604 F. App'x 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gamble-v-kenworthy-ca4-2015.