Gamble v. Davis

106 S.E.2d 89, 98 Ga. App. 470, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 615
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 27, 1958·No. 37381·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Felton, Chief Judge.

The petition is subject to- general demurrer in only one respect (see Milton Bradley Co. v. Cooper, 79 Ga. App. 302, 53 S. E. 2d 761), and that is that it states that the plaintiff was a minor but does not state, the plaintiff’s age. A minor is one less than twenty-on© years of age. Properly construed on general demurrer, the petition shows that the plaintiff was of sufficient age to be held to the duty of exercising ordinary care for his own safety. So construed the petition shows that the plaintiff, being under such a duty, was the author of his own misfortune and that his negligence in attempting to pick up the firecracker was the proximate cause of his injuries.

The court erred in overruling the general demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

Quillian and Nichols, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gamble v. Davis, 106 S.E.2d 89, 98 Ga. App. 470, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 615 (Ga. Ct. App. 1958).

106 S.E.2d 89 (Gamble v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Guardianship of J.D.
878 N.E.2d 141 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 2007)
Herrin v. Lámar
126 S.E.2d 454 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1962)