Gamble J. Palmer and Jean T. Cravens v. Alma Group, L. L. C.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Gamble J. Palmer and Jean T. Cravens v. Alma Group, L. L. C.

DecidedFebruary 16, 2006

Docket13-05-00406-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Gamble J. Palmer and Jean T. Cravens v. Alma Group, L. L. C. (Gamble J. Palmer and Jean T. Cravens v. Alma Group, L. L. C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gamble J. Palmer and Jean T. Cravens v. Alma Group, L. L. C., (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

NUMBER 13-05-406-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________

GAMBLE J. PALMER, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

ALMA GROUP, L.L.C., Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, GAMBLE J. PALMER, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-31,711-D. After the record was filed, the parties filed an amended emergency joint motion to dismiss appeal and remand to trial court. In the motion, the parties state that this case has been settled. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal and remand this matter to the trial court so that the trial court can issue an order directing the banks to return the funds on deposit and release the appropriate amounts to the parties. The parties further request an immediate issuance of the mandate.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties= joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion is granted. The judgment of the trial court is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED to the trial court for proceedings consistent with the parties= settlement agreement.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 16^th day of February, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NUMBER 13-05-406-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

________________________________________________________

GAMBLE J. PALMER, ET AL., Appellants,

v.

ALMA GROUP, L.L.C., Appellee.

On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, GAMBLE J. PALMER, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-31,711-D. After the record was filed, the parties filed an amended emergency joint motion to dismiss appeal and remand to trial court. In the motion, the parties state that this case has been settled. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal and remand this matter to the trial court so that the trial court can issue an order directing the banks to return the funds on deposit and release the appropriate amounts to the parties. The parties further request an immediate issuance of the mandate.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the parties= joint motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion is granted. The judgment of the trial court is REVERSED, and the matter is REMANDED to the trial court for proceedings consistent with the parties= settlement agreement.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 16^th day of February, 2006.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Gamble J. Palmer and Jean T. Cravens v. Alma Group, L. L. C., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gamble-j-palmer-and-jean-t-cravens-v-alma-group-l--texapp-2006.