Gamage v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Gamage v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.

598 S.W.2d 463, 1980 Ky. App. LEXIS 310

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedJanuary 18, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 598 S.W.2d 463 (Gamage v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gamage v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co., 598 S.W.2d 463, 1980 Ky. App. LEXIS 310 (Ky. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

HOWERTON, Judge.

Robert Gamage appeals from an adverse summary judgment in the Jefferson Circuit Court. The issue presented is whether a living revocable trust agreement allowing for revocation only upon written notice to the trustee may be revoked by will providing in part, “I dissolve the living trust ..” The trial court concluded that the will did not revoke the trust, and we agree.

In September 1977, Ruby Lee Gamage executed a trust agreement wherein her grandson, Isaac Payne Gamage, was the beneficiary. In June 1978, Mrs. Gamage executed a holographic will wherein she attempted to leave all of her property to her son, Robert P. Gamage, Jr., the executor of the estate and appellant in this case. The will was executed approximately one hour prior to her death and during non-banking hours. No separate written notice was provided by Mrs. Gamage which might have been given to or forwarded to some official of the appellee bank and trustee.

If a trust agreement provides a specific method for revocation, that method must be strictly adhered to in order for the revocation to be effective. Downs v. Security Trust Co., 175 Ky. 789, 194 S.W. 1041 (1917). This appears to be the current general rule. 76 Am.Jur.2d Trusts § 78 (1975) at 327.

It is also a general rule that if a trust agreement reserves the power to revoke the trust by giving notice to the trustee in a specified form or manner, the trustor may exercise that power only during his lifetime, and the power cannot be exercised through a will. 76 Am.Jur.2d Trusts § 79 (1975) at 328. See also, Annot., 18 A.L.R.2d 1010 (1951) at 1014, § 5, wherein it provides:

As a general rule, if the trust instrument reserves power to the trustor to revoke the trust by giving notice to the trustee in a specified form or manner, the trustor can exercise that power only during his lifetime and in the manner prescribed. He cannot exercise it by will.

Some trusts provide for revocation by a will, while other trusts reserve the power to revoke during the trustor’s lifetime. A will, however, is not effective until [465]*465after one’s death. Underhill v. United States Trust Co., 227 Ky. 444, 13 S.W.2d 502 (1929).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOWERTON, Judge.

Robert Gamage appeals from an adverse summary judgment in the Jefferson Circuit Court. The issue presented is whether a living revocable trust agreement allowing for revocation only upon written notice to the trustee may be revoked by will providing in part, “I dissolve the living trust ..” The trial court concluded that the will did not revoke the trust, and we agree.

In September 1977, Ruby Lee Gamage executed a trust agreement wherein her grandson, Isaac Payne Gamage, was the beneficiary. In June 1978, Mrs. Gamage executed a holographic will wherein she attempted to leave all of her property to her son, Robert P. Gamage, Jr., the executor of the estate and appellant in this case. The will was executed approximately one hour prior to her death and during non-banking hours. No separate written notice was provided by Mrs. Gamage which might have been given to or forwarded to some official of the appellee bank and trustee.

If a trust agreement provides a specific method for revocation, that method must be strictly adhered to in order for the revocation to be effective. Downs v. Security Trust Co., 175 Ky. 789, 194 S.W. 1041 (1917). This appears to be the current general rule. 76 Am.Jur.2d Trusts § 78 (1975) at 327.

It is also a general rule that if a trust agreement reserves the power to revoke the trust by giving notice to the trustee in a specified form or manner, the trustor may exercise that power only during his lifetime, and the power cannot be exercised through a will. 76 Am.Jur.2d Trusts § 79 (1975) at 328. See also, Annot., 18 A.L.R.2d 1010 (1951) at 1014, § 5, wherein it provides:

As a general rule, if the trust instrument reserves power to the trustor to revoke the trust by giving notice to the trustee in a specified form or manner, the trustor can exercise that power only during his lifetime and in the manner prescribed. He cannot exercise it by will.

Some trusts provide for revocation by a will, while other trusts reserve the power to revoke during the trustor’s lifetime. A will, however, is not effective until [465]*465after one’s death. Underhill v. United States Trust Co., 227 Ky. 444, 13 S.W.2d 502 (1929).

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

598 S.W.2d 463, 1980 Ky. App. LEXIS 310, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gamage-v-liberty-national-bank-trust-co-kyctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack