Gamache v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gamache v. State

871 S.W.2d 15, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1873, 1993 WL 498744

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 7, 1993·No. No. 63358·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would serve no precedential purpose; therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.-035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We find the motion court’s judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2). Further, we find no error of law appears. Rule 84.16(b)(5).

An opinion in this case would serve no precedential purpose; therefore, we affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.

Gamache v. State, 871 S.W.2d 15, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1873, 1993 WL 498744 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

871 S.W.2d 15 (Gamache v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related