GALYN SCOTT HOEFT vs STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 2, 2022·No. 22-1572·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

GALYN SCOTT HOEFT, Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D22-1572 LT Case Nos. 2022-MM-111-A 2022-MM-497-A

2022-MM-498-A

2022-MM-496-A

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

________________________________/ Opinion filed December 2, 2022

Appeal from the County Court for Citrus County, Bruce Carney, Judge.

MatthewJ.Metz, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences entered below but remand for entry of a written order revoking probation in Case No. 2022-MM-111. See Patt v. State, 876 So. 2d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (holding that order revoking probation must state in writing conditions which trial court found to have been violated).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of a written order revoking probation.

EVANDER, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GALYN SCOTT HOEFT vs STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

GALYN SCOTT HOEFT vs STATE OF FLORIDA (GALYN SCOTT HOEFT vs STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Patt v. State
876 So. 2d 1278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)