GALYN SCOTT HOEFT vs STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of GALYN SCOTT HOEFT vs STATE OF FLORIDA (GALYN SCOTT HOEFT vs STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
GALYN SCOTT HOEFT,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D22-1572 LT Case Nos. 2022-MM-111-A 2022-MM-497-A 2022-MM-498-A 2022-MM-496-A
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed December 2, 2022
Appeal from the County Court for Citrus County, Bruce Carney, Judge.
MatthewJ.Metz, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.
In this Anders 1 appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences entered
below but remand for entry of a written order revoking probation in Case No.
2022-MM-111. See Patt v. State, 876 So. 2d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)
(holding that order revoking probation must state in writing conditions which
trial court found to have been violated).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of a written order revoking probation.
EVANDER, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
1 Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
GALYN SCOTT HOEFT vs STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galyn-scott-hoeft-vs-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2022.