Galvez, Hector Rene

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedDecember 17, 2008
DocketPD-0544-08
StatusPublished

This text of Galvez, Hector Rene (Galvez, Hector Rene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Galvez, Hector Rene, (Tex. 2008).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD-0544-08

HECTOR RENE GALVEZ, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS McLENNAN COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

A jury found Appellant guilty of two counts of aggravated sexual assault and the trial

court assessed punishment at life imprisonment. The Court of Appeals reversed the

conviction, finding that extraneous offense evidence was inadmissible because Appellant

raised a defense of fabrication, but not a claim of "frame-up" or retaliation. Galvez v. State,

No. 10-03-00083-CR (Tex. App. — Waco 2008). In doing so, the Court of Appeals relied

on Newton v. State, No. 10-06-00160-CR (Tex. App. -- Waco 2007) (unpub.), which in turn, GALVEZ - 2

relied on Bass v. State, 222 S.W.3d 571, 576-77 (Houston--14th 2007).

The State has filed a petition for discretionary review contending the Court of Appeals

erred in finding evidence of Appellant's extraneous offenses inadmissible to rebut the

defensive theory of fabrication, arguing that the focus should not be on the title of the theory

but on the facts justifying admission.

This Court granted discretionary review in Bass, in order to address this issue. We

concluded that extraneous offense evidence is admissible to rebut a fabrication defense, and

that no categorical distinctions exist between such defenses and "frame-up" or "retaliation"

defenses. Bass v. State, S.W.3d (Tex. Crim. App. Nos. PD-0494-07, 0495-07, delivered

September 10, 2008), slip op. at 16-17. The Appellant's motion for rehearing was denied on

November 26, 2008. The Court of Appeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our

opinion in Bass. Accordingly, we grant the State’s petition for discretionary review, vacate

the judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals for

consideration in light of our opinion in Bass.

Delivered: December 17, 2008 Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bass v. State
222 S.W.3d 571 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Galvez, Hector Rene, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galvez-hector-rene-texcrimapp-2008.