Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Cooper

21 S.W. 678, 85 Tex. 431, 1893 Tex. LEXIS 204
Texas Supreme Court·Decided March 9, 1893·No. No. 30.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

The motion for rehearing, as well as the application for writ of error, seek to raise some questions that do not appear to have been presented by assignments of error.

These were properly disregarded by the Court of Civil Appeals, and must be by this court, without intimating any opinion that if fully considered any other result than that reached by the Court of Civil Appeals could legally have been arrived at.

The questions passed upon were properly decided, although the application made of some cases cited may not have been strictly correct.

The application for writ of error will be refused.

Application refused.

Delivered March 9, 1893.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Cooper, 21 S.W. 678, 85 Tex. 431, 1893 Tex. LEXIS 204 (Tex. 1893).

21 S.W. 678 (Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sherrod v. Pollard
21 S.W.2d 1101 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)
J. G. Smith Grain Co. v. Payne
290 S.W. 841 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1927)
Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Miller
191 S.W. 374 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1916)
Hathaway v. Texas Building & Loan Ass'n
45 S.W. 1023 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1898)