Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Todd

Texas Commission of Appeals

Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Todd

16 S.W.2d 1115

CourtTexas Commission of Appeals

DecidedApril 24, 1929

DocketNo. 1218—5292

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 16 S.W.2d 1115 (Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Todd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Commission of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Todd, 16 S.W.2d 1115 (Tex. Super. Ct. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

HARVEY P. J.

This is a companion case to G., H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Potter Floral & Confectionery Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 16 S.W.(2d) 1114, this day decided. With respect to liability of the railway company, there is no essential difference between the facts of that case and of this one.

We recommend that the judgment rendered by the trial court against the plaintiff in error and that of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming same be reversed, and that judgment denying a recovery by the defendants in error be here rendered.

CURETON, C. J.

Judgments of the district court and Court of Civil Appeals are both reversed, and judgment rendered for the plaintiff in error, as recommended by the Commission of Appeals.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI