Galvano v. Galvano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Galvano v. Galvano

303 A.D.2d 206, 755 N.Y.S.2d 599, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2395

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 11, 2003

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 303 A.D.2d 206 (Galvano v. Galvano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Galvano v. Galvano, 303 A.D.2d 206, 755 N.Y.S.2d 599, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2395 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered January 31, 2002, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff wife’s motion for an upward modification of pendente lite maintenance, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff wife made a sufficient showing of a substantial change of circumstances to warrant the upward modification directed by the motion court (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]). If the award is found at trial to be excessive, the court can remedy the inequity by appropriate adjustment in the equitable distribution award (see Gad v Gad, 283 AD2d 200 [2001]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Lerner and Gonzalez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marjory Fields, J.), entered January 31, 2002, which, inter alia, granted plaintiff wife’s motion for an upward modification of pendente lite maintenance, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff wife made a sufficient showing of a substantial change of circumstances to warrant the upward modification directed by the motion court (see Domestic Relations Law § 236 [B] [9] [b]). If the award is found at trial to be excessive, the court can remedy the inequity by appropriate adjustment in the equitable distribution award (see Gad v Gad, 283 AD2d 200 [2001]). Concur — Saxe, J.P., Sullivan, Ellerin, Lerner and Gonzalez, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

303 A.D.2d 206, 755 N.Y.S.2d 599, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/galvano-v-galvano-nyappdiv-2003.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack