Galvan v. Nationstar Mortg.

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided May 11, 2018·No. 75685·Unpublished

Opinion

lN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

GLENN GALVAN, No. 75685 Appellant,

vs.

NAT1ONSTA MORTGAGE,

Fli

Respondent. MAY 1 I 2018

_L-

BROWK

e"

CL rK OF RE lasm

uRr

BY

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL / OEM? CLERK

This is a pro se appeal from an order declaring appellant to be a vexatious litigant. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Lynne K. Simons, Judge.

Our review of the documents submitted to this court pursuant to NRAP 3(g) reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, the order appealed from is not substantively appealable. See NRAP 3A(b); Peck v. Grouser, 129 Nev. 120, 295 P.3d 586 (2013). This court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule. Taylor Constr. Co. u. Hilton Hotels, 100 Nev. 207, 678 P.2d 1152 (1984). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order determining a party to be a vexatious litigant. We lack jurisdiction and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

--- t- ciewStrazta-77 A4L.Cese.4 Parragui rre Stiglich

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947,

11 111 11 ii

cc: Hon. Lynne K. Simons, District Judge Glenn Galvan Ballard Spahr LLY/Las Vegas McCarthy & Holthus, - LLP/Las Vegas Akerman LLP/Las Vegas Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

e (0) 1947A

=FPI

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Galvan v. Nationstar Mortg., (Neb. 2018).

Galvan v. Nationstar Mortg. (Galvan v. Nationstar Mortg.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

TAYLOR CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
678 P.2d 1152 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1984)
Peck v. Crouser
295 P.3d 586 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)