Galusha v. Hughes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Galusha v. Hughes

162 A.D. 933

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 15, 1914·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that the bringing of the action and the other circumstances are sufficient to establish a repudiation by the plaintiff of the contract on the ground of fraud. (Gould, v. Cayuga County Nat. Bank, 86 N. Y. 75; Davis v. Rosenzweig Realty Co., 192 id. 128; Cox v. Stillman, 133 App. Div. 433.) All concurred, except Lambert, J., who dissented upon the ground that there is a failure of proof to establish fraud as a basis of rescission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide event. Held, that the bringing of the action and the other circumstances are sufficient to establish a repudiation by the plaintiff of the contract on the ground of fraud. (Gould, v. Cayuga County Nat. Bank, 86 N. Y. 75; Davis v. Rosenzweig Realty Co., 192 id. 128; Cox v. Stillman, 133 App. Div. 433.) All concurred, except Lambert, J., who dissented upon the ground that there is a failure of proof to establish fraud as a basis of rescission.

Galusha v. Hughes, 162 A.D. 933 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

162 A.D. 933 (Galusha v. Hughes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related